If your SBOM cannot be independently verified later, it is not evidence.
CBOM Compliance converts software manifests into independently verifiable,
cryptographically signed receipts that prove what existed at a specific point in time.
An SBOM alone is a claim. A signed receipt is evidence.
Zero RetentionDeterministic OutputsSigned ReceiptsIndependent Verification
Why This Matters
What This Prevents
Evidence Layer
Without independently verifiable evidence, software state becomes difficult to defend after the fact.
This system exists to give organizations a portable proof artifact they can validate later, outside the original submission session.
Each verification run produces a portable, signed receipt that serves as independently
verifiable evidence of software composition at a fixed point in time.
Receipt Status
SIGNED
Fingerprint
SHA-384
Structure Proof
Merkle Root
Verification Path
Public Key
Issued Artifact
Portable, signed evidence of manifest state with an independent verification path.
Verification Access
Pricing
Built for defense contractors, MSSPs, and software vendors operating under EO 14028, CMMC 2.0, and the EU Cyber Resilience Act.
No support tickets. No account managers. The cryptographic receipt is the deliverable.
One-Time Packs
One-Time
Standard Pack
$49
10 signed receipts
Proof of software composition at a fixed point in time
SHA-384 Merkle commitment
RS256 signed JWS receipt
Zero retention processing
Independent public-key verification
CycloneDX / SPDX JSON input
By purchasing you agree to our Terms of Service. All sales final.
One-Time
Advanced Pack
$199
10 signed receipts
Proof of composition plus verified vulnerability state
Everything in Standard
OSV / NVD vulnerability intelligence
Component-level risk analysis
Confidence scoring across sources
Time-aware re-evaluation
By purchasing you agree to our Terms of Service. All sales final.
Monthly Subscriptions
Subscription
Professional
$299/mo
25 receipts per month · Standard tier
Continuous issuance of audit-ready cryptographic evidence
Standard tier receipts
Recurring monthly access
Access code issued on purchase
Zero retention architecture
Cancel anytime
By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service. Cancel anytime.
Subscription
Professional Plus
$999/mo
100 receipts per month · Standard & Advanced
High-volume issuance with continuous re-evaluation capability
Standard and Advanced tier
Full vulnerability intelligence
Time-aware re-evaluation
Access code issued on purchase
Cancel anytime
By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Service. Cancel anytime.
Enterprise
Enterprise
Enterprise Contract
Custom Pricing
Annual contracts · Volume licensing · Custom DID integration
Integrated into compliance workflows and audit pipelines
Submitted manifests are processed transiently for the sole purpose of generating
a signed verification receipt.
No uploaded data is stored, retained, indexed, or shared.
Processing occurs in-memory within a serverless execution context and is discarded
after computation.
Issued receipts are signed by the system and can be verified independently using
the public verification key endpoint.
Verification does not require continued access to this platform or the original upload session.
No persistent storage • No manifest logging • No database retention of uploaded contents
Advanced tier: receipt drift detection and comparison
Embeddable verified badge for README and websites
The receipt proves software composition state at issuance time.
It does not by itself prove full runtime safety, replace remediation work, or substitute for a complete compliance program.
Public verification key endpoint:
/.netlify/functions/public-key
Verification Model
Proof of submitted manifest state at issuance time, with signed output and an independent validation path.
Authority Boundary
This system proves the submitted input and signs the resulting receipt. It does not claim full runtime truth or automatic legal compliance.
Output
Verification Result
No manifest verified yet.
Status
-
Format
-
Components
-
Timestamp
-
Signature
-
Provenance
-
Access Role
-
Tier
-
Tier Label
-
Scope
-
Manifest SHA-384
-
Merkle Root
-
Receipt ID
-
Advanced Risk Analysis
Risk Status
-
Confidence
-
Issue Count
0
Sources Used
-
Component-Level Findings
Upgrade Available
Advanced tier includes proof + intelligence + time-aware trust evaluation.
Multi-source vulnerability intelligence
Component-level issue detection
Confidence scoring
Source-backed analysis (NVD, OSV, Internal)
Time-aware re-evaluation of existing receipts
Signed Receipt (JWS)
-
Validation Notes
Detected Fields
Raw Receipt
Drift Detection
Compare Two Receipts
Advanced
Paste two signed receipts (JWS) to see exactly what changed between them — added components, removed dependencies, version upgrades, and risk delta. Requires Advanced tier receipts.
Receipt Comparison
System Interpretation
How This Works
Overview
Receipt-issuing evidence layer
CBOM Compliance processes supported JSON manifests and returns a cryptographically
signed verification receipt. The output is designed to function as machine-readable,
independently verifiable evidence tied to the submitted manifest, not merely a pass/fail screen.
Flow
Verification process
Upload a CycloneDX or SPDX JSON manifest.
The system validates structure and extracts component entries.
A SHA-384 fingerprint and Merkle root are derived from the manifest data.
A signed receipt is issued with timestamp, manifest hash, and verification metadata.
Proof Scope
What the receipt proves
That this manifest was processed by the NextGenRails verification system.
That the output receipt was signed by the system's private signing key.
That the manifest fingerprint and Merkle root in the receipt are deterministic outputs of the submitted data.
That the receipt can be verified independently using the public verification key.
Boundaries
What it does not claim
It does not certify that software is vulnerability-free.
It does not guarantee legal compliance by itself.
It does not replace a full security audit or formal attestation framework.
It produces cryptographically signed verification evidence for submitted manifests.
Intended Use
Who This Is For
Operational Buyer Fit
This system is built for environments where software claims must be defensible, not just stated.
Defense
CMMC-bound contractors
Supply Chain
SBOM-submitting vendors
Security
Audit-preparation teams
Evidence
Post-delivery proof needs
Defense contractors subject to CMMC requirements
Vendors submitting SBOMs to government buyers
Security teams preparing for audit or certification
Organizations that must prove software state after delivery